Most people enter trading with the idea that they are going to make a lot of money. In other words, they have high expectations. There is nothing inherently wrong with that idea. In fact, we need motivation, and making a lot of money can be a great a motivator. Unfortunately, many traders also have low self-confidence. And are not profitable or not trading at the level they desire or are capable of.
This is a fairly common condition that can be expressed in the simple equation: High Expectations + Low Self-Confidence = Poor or Inconsistent Performance.
As a trading psychologist, part of my work with traders involves changing the equation, where high expectations are replaced with a focus on executing one’s trading process correctly and low self-confidence is replaced with high self-confidence.
The new formula becomes: Focus on Process Goals + High Self-Confidence = Better and More Consistent Performance.
I’ve been reading Mike Bellafiore’s excellent book, “One Good Trade”, and the book seems to be saying the same thing. In fact, just reciting the title, “One Good Trade” as a mantra (repeat it over and over) while trading seems to have the effect of pointing one in the right direction of focusing on executing or following the correct process while remaining flexible and realistic with expectations.
This approach accomplishes a number of things, and helps to operationalize what I mean when I talk about focusing on what we can control and letting go of the rest. It is also a good example of one of my rules in action, that we must be rigid with risk but flexible with expectations.
Trading well over time requires that we control what we can and let the market do the rest. In other words, we control the risk and are flexible with expectations by accepting the fact that we must adapt to what the market is doing regardless of our wishes. When we do this consistently, we build self-confidence over time.
[…] This post was mentioned on Twitter by ryandbaird, John , MProfileTrader, Christoph Lahrs, LittleTrader and others. LittleTrader said: RT @PopDocTrader: Changing this equation will improve your performance http://bit.ly/hpsOPw #FT71 […]
Reminds me of Van Tharps psychologically tuned trading approach.
@Sky Minor Most traders get in their own way. The equation that I wrote about it is adapted from sports psychology where athletes are coached to focus on what they can control, their execution, as opposed to only focusing on the score.
Andrew Menaker, PhD
[…] Changing the Equation (Andrew Menaker) via @smbcapital […]
[…] same recurring mistakes over and over. What would happen if you identified a recurring mistake? Would you do anything differently while trading as a result? Would you need or use some type of structure or process to assist you in not repeating the same […]
[…] The bottom line is that I feel comfortable with making my entry. Notice I said ‘comfortable’, which is not the same as expecting it to work. I look at any one trade as having a 50/50 chance of working, even if I feel comfortable about it. Does that make sense? If not, you have not internalized how probabilities work, and trading is largely a matter of probabilities. If you have a stat that says, “this works 60% of the time”, you must also realize, and this is the part where most people glaze over and don’t get it…that just because you see 60% of trades or a certain set-up win, or a certain market condition result in something, it does not mean that this will be the case on the next 6 out of 10 occurrences. Within a distribution, even a skewed distribution, each individual occurrence or data point is 50/50. Read some Mark Douglas if you still don’t get this critical concept. […]
[…] The bottom line is that I feel comfortable with making my entry. Notice I said ‘comfortable’, which is not the same as expecting it to work. I look at any one trade as having a 50/50 chance of working, even if I feel comfortable about it. Does that make sense? If not, you have not internalized how probabilities work, and trading is largely a matter of probabilities. If you have a stat that says, “this works 60% of the time”, you must also realize, and this is the part where most people glaze over and don’t get it…that just because you see 60% of trades or a certain set-up win, or a certain market condition result in something, it does not mean that this will be the case on the next 6 out of 10 occurrences. Within a distribution, even a skewed distribution, each individual occurrence or data point is 50/50. Read some Mark Douglas if you still don’t get this critical concept. […]
[…] Real, lasting strength comes from knowing you can be vulnerable. Never assume you are not vulnerable. Interestingly, I learned that from some of the toughest people I’ve ever met, when I worked with military special operations personnel. Admittedly, I taught other traders about this before I internalized it in my own trading. […]
[…] instead of what the market is doing. A trader who is less focused on perfectionism and has more flexible expectations realizes the inherent uncertainty underlying any market is the reason why losses are part of the business. This realization helps one to develop […]